Certainty of Punishment versus Severity of Punishment: An Experimental Investigation
نویسنده
چکیده
Compliance with laws and regulations depends on the expected penalty facing violators. The expected penalty depends on both the probability of punishment and the severity of the punishment if caught. A key question in the economics of crime literature is whether increasing the probability of punishment is a more effective deterrent than an equivalent increase in the severity of punishment. This paper uses laboratory experiments to investigate this issue, and finds that increasing the severity of punishment is a more effective deterrent than an equivalent increase in the probability of punishment. This result contrasts with the findings of the empirical crime literature. EPrint Type: Departmental Technical Report
منابع مشابه
Do Facts Speak Louder than Words? Understanding the Sources of Punishment Perceptions in Software Piracy Behavior
Software piracy has become a global problem that hinders the development of software industry. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms that drive users’ software piracy behavior. Previous literature on this issue heavily relied on the general deterrence theory (GDT) suggesting that two key punishment perceptions namely punishment severity and punishment certainty dete...
متن کاملThe Interplay of Certainty, Severity, and Celerity in Punishment for Wrongdoing
This is a conference version and should not be cited or published in any form without permission from the authors. ABSTRACT While the deterrent effect of certainty and severity of punishment in addition to the interaction between the two has been evaluated for various criminal behaviors, few have assessed the influence of the celerity of punishment, or the additive influence of the interactions...
متن کاملChapter Two: Impact of the Sentencing Guidelines on the Certainty and Severity of Punishment
The text and legislative history of the Sentencing Reform Act [SRA], reviewed in Chapter One, make clear that the SRA aimed to increase the certainty and severity of punishment by eliminating parole and increasing sentencing severity for some crimes. Congress instructed the Commission to ensure that “the guidelines reflect the fact that, in many cases, current sentences do not accurately reflec...
متن کاملA Comparison of the Inhibitors of Hacking vs. Shoplifting
The means by which the U.S. justice system attempts to control illegal hacking are practiced under the assumption that hacking is like any other illegal crime. This chapter evaluates this assumption by comparing illegal hacking to shoplifting. Three inhibitors of two illegal behaviors are examined: informal sanction, punishment severity, and punishment certainty. A survey of 136 undergraduate s...
متن کاملThe Proper Role of Criminal Law in Road Safety
THIS PAPER SEEKS TO EXAMINE THE MANNER IN WHICH DRINK-DRIVING and certain speeding offences are dealt with in the criminal justice system. This analysis will use Victorian legislation; however many of the features of Victorian legislation have equivalents in other jurisdictions. The focus will be on interference with driving licences. This is one of the most common sanctions employed and one wh...
متن کامل